Of need and accidents.

I know why you won't speak with me, and why you would have been told it's not a good idea.

We both know that the constructs of "normal life" are nothing but a house of cards, blown away at a couple of innocent  questions.

And so, it'll be down to blind faith.

It's not that hard evidence lies on my side. There's no such thing as hard evidence when it comes to our life decisions, save for extreme situations.

But, as I might have quoted someplace, the need is expressed through the accident.

I am consistent with my need, if unfulfilled. It is that consistency and solidity you fear, against which all the smoke you were sold would be ineffectual.

The answers to this can only be "ad hominem", so much hot air.